The report and the code that calls this never made it into the chat.
What a pasted snippet can see
A chat window sees one pasted snippet
It never sees the full report, the rest of the file, or who else calls the code.
Point ML.ai at a scanner report. It checks who uses the code, patches each finding, tests the fix, and tells you what only you can do.
Fix the security findings reported in scanner-output.txt
Read scanner-output.txt2 findings
Searched for users of stripeKey and findUserByName0 others
Ran Node with an injection string as the name
The payload goes through as a bound parameter.
One thing I can’t do from here: treat the committed Stripe key as compromised and rotate it.
Describe a task or ask a question

for security fixesDevelopers with a scanner report and a backlog of small, careful patches.
Findings nobody has had time to patch.
A live key that has to leave the code.
A patch tested against the exploit.
A patch that reads right can still be wrong.
You patch the line the report names and hope nothing else called it. The secret is still in history.
scanner-output.txt, 2 findings
users.js:4 SQL injectionPatched
config.js:2 Stripe keyRemoved
Who else calls these?Not checked
Is the key still live?Open
The ticket closes while the key is still live


You point at the report. ML.ai checks callers, patches, tests, and flags what is left for you.
Fix the security findings in scanner-output.txt
Read the report and searched for callers0 others
Build
Build · Read report · Search callers · Patch · Test
Reads the report and the code, searches for callers, patches each finding, and runs the code to check.
explore
explore · Read · Search · Write
Read-only. Ask where a function or secret is used before anything changes.
A finding names a line. The safe fix depends on who else uses it.
Explorer


general, the default agent, takes the whole task
Fix the security findings reported in scanner-output.txt
Three common failures, and what ML.ai did about each in a real run.
Callers checkedWith ML.ai
findUserByName0 other users
stripeKey0 other users
Changing a function to close a finding breaks code you forgot about.
How 
handles it
ML.ai searched for callers of findUserByName and stripeKey first. None outside the two files.
The fix, triedWith ML.ai
users.js:4payload bound as ?
config.js:2no key in source
The diff reads like a fix, and nobody tried the exploit.
How 
handles it
ML.ai ran an injection string through the patched query. It went through as a bound parameter.
The Stripe keyWith ML.ai
config.jskey removed
Stripe dashboardrotate it
git historyflagged
The key leaves the code, the ticket closes, and the key still works.
How 
handles it
ML.ai said to treat the key as compromised and rotate it in Stripe, which it cannot do from the repo.
What to expect, so nothing surprises you.
ML.ai changes the code and tells you to rotate the key. It cannot reach Stripe.
Also changing a file it did not declare
Editing a file outside its stated list needs your OK.
Use @explore, which is read-only, to see where a function or secret is used before patching.
It reads the report you point it at and works each finding: open the code, check callers, patch, test. It does not run the scanner.
Yes. It ran the patched query with an injection string and showed it bound as a parameter.
It moves the secret out of the code and tells you to rotate it. Removing it from source does not un-leak it.
Per ML.ai’s docs, prompts, selected file content and tool results go to the ML.ai model service; the engine runs locally. Check your organization’s policies for confidential code.

today, or talk to us about what is nextInstall the editor agent on your own machine, or book a call to talk through your team’s workloads